Knaken launches new campaign ‘The Standard’
In a world where traditional banking, with its restrictions, costs, and time-consuming processes, has become the standard for many, we at Knaken ask an important question: why limit yourself to…
Cryptocurrency, or simply “crypto,” has become an important topic in the financial world in recent years. It is a digital currency that operates outside of traditional banking systems and uses cryptography to secure transactions. As crypto has gained popularity, there has been controversy over its permissibility in Islamic finance. In this blog, we explore the debate over whether crypto is haram (forbidden) or halal (permissible) in Islam.
Understanding the Islamic Perspective
Islamic finance is based on principles that promote fairness and equity in financial transactions. One of the core principles of Islamic finance is the prohibition of riba (interest). Riba refers to any excess or increase that is obtained by the lender as a condition for the loan or its extension. Many scholars argue that the interest-based nature of certain cryptocurrencies, such as staking and lending, renders them inconsistent with Islamic financial principles. However, Islamic scholars differ in opinion regarding the permissibility of crypto.
Arguments in Favor of Crypto
One argument in favor of crypto is that it is decentralized and operates outside of traditional banking systems, making it less vulnerable to the risks of centralized banking. Furthermore, crypto may provide financial inclusion to those who are excluded from traditional financial institutions. This is especially relevant in Muslim-majority countries, where a large portion of the population is unbanked. Some Muslim-majority countries have even embraced crypto, such as Turkey, which has announced plans to develop its own digital currency.
Arguments Against Crypto
On the other hand, some scholars view crypto as speculative and thus haram. The lack of regulation and the volatility of crypto also pose risks for investors. Moreover, some scholars see crypto as potentially conducive to illegal activities, such as money laundering and financing terrorism. This is due to the anonymity and decentralization of crypto, which can make it difficult to trace and regulate.
Conclusion
The debate surrounding the permissibility of crypto in Islamic finance is ongoing, and opinions may vary among individuals and scholars. It is important to seek knowledge and consult Islamic scholars before making personal decisions regarding crypto. While there are arguments in favor of crypto, there are also valid objections against it. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to weigh the pros and cons and make an informed decision based on their own understanding of Islamic financial principles. To make a well-informed decision, it is advisable to consult a knowledgeable Islamic scholar, such as an imam, regarding matters related to Islamic finance. As there are ongoing debates and differing opinions among scholars regarding the permissibility of crypto in Islam, it is crucial to seek advice from a reliable scholar who is well-versed in Islamic financial principles. They can guide you in making informed decisions that align with your personal beliefs and values.
Knaken Cryptohandel B.V. is registered with De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. (DNB) as a provider of crypto services. DNB supervises Knaken Cryptohandel B.V.'s compliance with the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Prevention) Act and the Sanctions Act 1977. Knaken Cryptohandel B.V. is not subject to prudential supervision by DNB or conduct supervision by the AFM. This means that there is no supervision of financial requirements or business risks and there is no specific financial consumer protection.
Investing in crypto-related products involves significant risks.
